President Trump Should Back Up California Law Enforcement Officers Defying Sanctuary State Laws

Law Enforcement officer has giving their broad support for President Trump from the local governments up to the Federal level. President Trump needs to announce that he will back Peace officers. In northern California some Law Enforcement Officers will be aiding ICE officers doing immigration raids as well as being material witnesses of who is giving the orders of ignoring Federal immigration law hopefully using Federal whistleblower protection laws. Some will do this at personal risk of retaliation from their superiors regardless what the law says.

Can you say the state of California has become a criminal and racketeering operation? Sworn Peace Officers from the city municipality all the way up to the state Highway patrol are stuck between a rock and a hard place.  The Federal government under the US Constitution has jurisdiction over enforcing immigration laws.  Mayors and the California state governor cannot use the ninth and tenth amendments to justify passing a law making California a sanctuary state. This is why the President Trump needs to tell California Law Enforcement officers that he has their back when the state Attorney General says they will Prosecute Employers and I can see penalizing Peace officers aiding the Federal government enforcing immigration laws.

If the Department of Justice prosecutes Sanctuary city leaders as Department of Homeland Security has requested the US Attorney General to do. It would not surprise me if Police officers, Department chiefs, and County sheriffs with the leadership on all levels in these agencies might face Federal charges for defying Federal immigration laws willfully.

To side with the governor giving aid and comfort to illegal immigrants by deceiving ICE or hindering their efforts. These officers can be in violation of their oath.

The Nuremberg trials set the legal precedent of I WAS JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS is not a moral defense or an excuse to break the law by committing treason giving aid and comfort to traitors harboring illegal immigrants. The Sanctuary State Law is an act of treason because it gives aid and comfort to those who want to overthrow the California government and make it a part of Mexico who have crossed the border illegally.

This what the California oath and code of ethics California Peace officers swear to:

” I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

“And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other- wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other-wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means. I will not advocate nor become (name of office) a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means.”

There is nothing in that oath saying Peace officers swear allegiance to Gov Gerry Brown and his political agenda. If I was a peace officer in California. I would not be arresting a person for calling a transsexual a ” he”which is not the politically correct pronoun of their gender identity or parents for refusing to vaccinate their children for reason of conscience. These laws are unconstitutional that violate people’s personal liberties.

I applaud California resisting the Department of Justice going after the Cannabis industry and other matters involving the ninth and tenth amendments of the US Constitution. Otherwise defying Federal immigration laws telling Peace officer they will be sanctioned or fired if they give material support for iCE officers. The President needs to tell California peace Officers that he has their backs and will protect their jobs upholding the law.

The rule of law is on the Presidents side. What are your thoughts?

4 thoughts on “President Trump Should Back Up California Law Enforcement Officers Defying Sanctuary State Laws”

  1. california is a migrant sh*t hole……you don’t change this, watch what will happen to california…..the whole state will turn into a migrant sh*t hole…period

  2. I want to know how and why some minor county clerk can be arrested for refusing homosexuals but these “Enforcers of the Law” can flaunt the Law and walk free

    SUE them for every cent they have !!!!!

    The “Sanctuary City/State Financial and Criminal Accountability Law”
    Every politician that votes for or endorses the mythical “sanctuary” from Federal Immigration Law shall be subject to obtaining and providing a Surety Bond to secure 100% Reparations to any Legal Citizen injured, murdered, raped, robbed, or in any way harmed, including mental distress, by said Illegal persons in the area. By their refusal to honor their oath to uphold the Constitution and the Law of the land the said politicians have negated any “governmental immunity”. Said politicians are Personally Criminal Accomplices to any crimes committed by the Criminals they are Harboring. Said politicians are Personally Financially Liable for damages, reparations, and to “make whole” any Legal Citizen harmed by the Criminals they are Harboring.
    —————————————-
    Yes, “sanctuary implementors” DO OWE DAMAGES for any harm their law breaking leads to. By the way, why is a clerk jailed for refusing to do her duty and register homosexual marriages,but these politicians and police are not jailed for allowing sanctuary cities and refusing to do THEIR duty?
    Cannot say it often enough, these politicians took an oath to uphold the CONSTITUTION of the United States and therefore cannot whine that they do not have to enforce Federal Law. Every judge or politician blocking that wall is providing material aid and support to Narco Terrorists. Anyone who provides “sanctuary” to an illegal is harboring criminals, PERIOD. And if that illegal commits a crime the sanctuary providers is a ACTIVE ACCOMPLICE to the crime and is PERSONALLY Financially Liable for FULL restitution and gets to serve time for the crime…………… BOOK’EM DANNO. If the “Appointed Defenders” of Our HOUSE refuse to do their duty, they are accomplices and personally responsible for the results. “Public Officials” That refuse to enforce the immigration laws and provide “sanctuary” to ILLEGALS automatically assume personal financial responsibility for ANY crimes and any damages created by said ILLEGALS. They also are accessories to any crimes committed by their ILLEGALS and should be JAILED as Accomplices. Same applies to any priest/church that provides “sanctuary”

  3. —— RULES of SANCTUARY ——-
    you want “sanctuary? you have live by the RULES,
    but ILLEGALS broke the RULES to get into America so they cannot HAVE sanctuary
    because ILLEGALS don’t want to live BY THE RULES of sanctuary
    The fugitive had to remain within the walls of the sanctuary, abandon his or her oath to the king, followed which they had a short period of time to leave the country.
    READ THAT AGAIN — “a short period of time to LEAVE THE COUNTRY.”
    AND AGAIN — ” LEAVE THE COUNTRY.”
    They were considered to be “dead”, so much so that their land was forfeited to the King and their wife considered to be a widow. If they refused to renounce their oath, they could be starved out of the sanctuary.
    Henry VIII of England even took to branding them with a hot iron before they left the country just in case they tried to return; they could then be quickly spotted and arrested.
    ecclesiastical immunity has no legal standing.

  4. Tramp, sorry Trump, will not say a word, he wants to remain out of the picture. All Trump wants to do is run is mouth, he does not care about the US of A

Comments are closed.